Đang lật trang.
Đang mở chương tiếp theo…
Này… tạo phong cách đọc riêng nhé.
Phông chữ và chủ đề nằm trong Giao diện. Hãy chọn điều dễ chịu cho mắt.
Đang mở chương tiếp theo…
The share of a token's supply associated with a small number of addresses or inferred owners, measured under an explicit method.
Đang kiểm tra khả năng đọc thành tiếng của trình duyệt…
Bài đọc này hiện có bằng tiếng Anh. Giao diện sử dụng ngôn ngữ bạn đã chọn.
Đọc bản gốc tiếng Anh →A list of the largest token accounts is an on-chain observation, not a complete ownership register. Solana exposes an RPC method for retrieving large token accounts, while its token model distinguishes mint and holding accounts. A large account may belong to an exchange, a liquidity pool, a vesting contract, or an individual. One person may also control many accounts. These possibilities make address concentration different from beneficial-owner concentration.
Suppose the ten largest accounts hold 60 percent of a token's total supply. If one account is a pool contract and another represents thousands of exchange customers, calling those ten accounts ten insiders would overstate what the data shows. Excluding them mechanically can also hide relevant liquidity or custody exposure. Report the denominator, block or retrieval time, account classifications, and uncertainty. Total supply and circulating supply can produce different concentration percentages.
Concentration may affect market depth, voting power, or the impact of a large transfer, but it does not by itself prove manipulation. Ownership inference requires additional evidence, and transaction links can have several explanations. Compare concentration with vesting, mint permissions, pool liquidity, and the source of account labels. Historical changes are often more informative than one screenshot. Preserve raw account data so a reader can distinguish a reproducible observation from an analyst's uncertain grouping of related wallets.