페이지를 넘기고 있습니다.
다음 장을 불러오고 있습니다…
잠깐… 나만의 읽기 환경을 만들어 보세요.
글꼴과 테마는 화면 설정에서 설정하세요. 눈의 편안함도 중요합니다.
다음 장을 불러오고 있습니다…
The share of a token's supply associated with a small number of addresses or inferred owners, measured under an explicit method.
브라우저의 읽어주기 지원을 확인하는 중…
이 읽기 자료는 현재 영어로 제공됩니다. 인터페이스에는 선택한 언어가 적용됩니다.
영어 원문 읽기 →A list of the largest token accounts is an on-chain observation, not a complete ownership register. Solana exposes an RPC method for retrieving large token accounts, while its token model distinguishes mint and holding accounts. A large account may belong to an exchange, a liquidity pool, a vesting contract, or an individual. One person may also control many accounts. These possibilities make address concentration different from beneficial-owner concentration.
Suppose the ten largest accounts hold 60 percent of a token's total supply. If one account is a pool contract and another represents thousands of exchange customers, calling those ten accounts ten insiders would overstate what the data shows. Excluding them mechanically can also hide relevant liquidity or custody exposure. Report the denominator, block or retrieval time, account classifications, and uncertainty. Total supply and circulating supply can produce different concentration percentages.
Concentration may affect market depth, voting power, or the impact of a large transfer, but it does not by itself prove manipulation. Ownership inference requires additional evidence, and transaction links can have several explanations. Compare concentration with vesting, mint permissions, pool liquidity, and the source of account labels. Historical changes are often more informative than one screenshot. Preserve raw account data so a reader can distinguish a reproducible observation from an analyst's uncertain grouping of related wallets.